Benzene Injury Law

Benzene Injury Law Blog

Case Summary – Steel Mill Pipefitter Leukemia Settlement

The Plaintiff was employed as a pipefitter at US Steel’s Clairton Works in Pittsburgh. Many years before his leukemia diagnosis, he worked at the plant from 1971 to 1983. The Clairton Plant is the largest coke manufacturing facility in the United States.  It has ten coke oven batteries and they produce 4.3 million tons of coke annually. Coke production is notorious for producing benzene as a byproduct.

Free Case Evaluation

    The Plaintiff’s job required him to work in various areas of the facility including coke ovens, a tar plant, tar stills, and screening stations. He claimed that benzene was present throughout the facility, and he personally worked with valves, pumps, pipelines, and standpipes that contained benzene. He asserted that his benzene exposure occurred through inhalation, ingestion, and skin absorption. 

    Steel Mill Pipefitter Leukemia Lawyer

    In 2016, 33 years after his last benzene exposure at US Steel, the plaintiff was diagnosed with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). The plaintiff believed that his leukemia was a direct result of his benzene exposures many years before at US Steel. He filed a negligence lawsuit against U.S. Steel Corporation in Pittsburgh in 2018. 

    Why wasn’t this case filed under the Workers’ Compensation Act? 

    Many states have unique time limits for no fault workers’ compensation actions.  This case was brought under Pennsylvania law.  In Pennsylvania, employees cannot file a workers’ compensation action if the diagnosis of the work-related disease occurred more than 300 weeks after the last toxic exposure at work. And so, this plaintiff’s workers’ compensation claim was time-barred.  Luckily, in Pennsylvania, workers with no remedy under the Workers’ Compensation Act are able to seek compensation for their injuries in a personal injury action.  This unique legal wrinkle allowed the plaintiff to sue his employer for negligence.

    The pipefitter’s leukemia lawsuit claimed that U.S. Steel knew or should have known about the dangers of benzene exposure. He claimed that his employer failed to protect him from this dangerous work environment. The Plaintiff’s allegations included negligence, gross negligence, battery, and fraud. The case was settled before trial and the Plaintiff received an undisclosed amount from U.S. Steel. 

    Pipefitter Leukemia Lawyer

    Pipefitter Benzene Exposures and Leukemia

    Pipefitters may be exposed to benzene through their work because exposure can occur during opening, maintenance, and cleaning of valves, pumps, and pipes that contain pure benzene, or through chemicals that are composed partly of benzene. If you or a loved one have been employed as a pipefitter and have been diagnosed with a benzene related illness, it may be a result of occupational exposures and you may have a claim. Call Benzene Lawyers at 1-800-BENZENE to learn more today.

    Hughes Law Offices is providing this case history to inform visitors about actual case fact patterns, settlements, verdicts, and rulings. Unless specifically noted, the cases summarized herein were not handled by attorneys at Hughes Law Offices.  If you believe that you have a case similar to this one, feel free to call 1-800-BENZENE and speak with an attorney today.

    Client Testimonials

    Find Out More From Our Clients

    Wrongful Death Case

    My family hired attorney Hughes for the wrongful death of my brother. Mr. Hughes worked very hard on our case, the results were excellent. I would recommend him to anyone needing an attorney, he is a very fair and kind person.

    - Carolyn, Chicago IL

    Unique Expertise

    Andrew took over my asthma claim with the railroad after a different law firm failed to meet expectations. Andrew’s unique expertise in the field of diesel related injury gave him the ability to build my case exceptionally well. When Andrew presented...

    - Steven, Chicago IL

    Professional and Trustworthy

    From my very first contact with Andrew we have found him to be compassionate, hard working and trust worthy. In the eight months we were associated with Andrew we feel he has also become a friend of ours...

    - Ronald, Chicago IL

    Worked Diligently

    For the past two years Andrew Hughes has worked diligently in helping me with my case against the Norfolk Southern R.R. During this time he has kept me thoroughly informed about my case his expertise led to me getting a generous settlement...

    - Client, Chicago IL

    Questions? We Can Help! Contact Us Today!