Benzene Injury Law

Benzene Injury Law Blog

Gas Station Attendants/Mechanics and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Case Summary:  Oil Companies Prevail When Plaintiff’s Expert is Barred from Testifying

The plaintiff’s husband was a former gas station attendant and mechanic who had been diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (“AML”) in June 2013.  The mechanic passed away five months after his leukemia diagnosis. The widow sued various oil companies, including Chevron, Shell, and Texaco. She claimed that her husband's work as a mechanic and gas station attendant, and the associated benzene exposures, caused his leukemia. Benzene is a component of gasoline. Plaintiff argued that her husband inhaled gasoline fumes and had gasoline spill on his clothes.  She argued that he was also exposed to benzene when using gasoline to wash his hands and automotive parts.

Free Case Evaluation

    The late husband refueled cars and also worked as a mechanic. A coworker provided testimony that gasoline would often spill on employees when refueling cars. This coworker also added that there was a bucket of gasoline in the garage and mechanics would often clean their hands and automotive parts in the bucket. Plaintiff also recalled that she would often smell the fumes on her husband’s work clothes when she washed them at home.

    Plaintiff disclosed an expert to testify that the mechanic’s acute myeloid leukemia was caused by his gasoline exposures (and with it benzene). But plaintiff’s husband passed away before the expert could interview him. Therefore, plaintiff’s expert could only base his benzene dose estimates off of interviews with the widow and her husband’s former coworkers. 

    The defendants moved to bar the expert.  The oil companies argued that the expert should not be allowed to testify as to the husband’s benzene dose because the co-worker testimony about exposures from 50 years ago was not reliable. The judge agreed with the defendants and barred the plaintiff’s expert’s testimony. 

    Mechanics & Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Plaintiff’s husband was undoubtedly exposed to toxic levels of benzene while working at this gas station in the 1960s. But being exposed – and being able to actually prove up those exposures – are two different things. Unfortunately, the court agreed with defendants’ arguments that the expert testimony should not be allowed.  The court reasoned that the expert’s report was speculative. First-hand accounts from an interview with the decedent would have likely been more persuasive to the court. 

    This case illustrates the importance of seeking a benzene lawyer as soon as possible after the leukemia diagnosis.  Had the expert been able to interview the plaintiff’s husband, the expert may have had proper foundation for his dose opinions. These cases are complex undertakings with deep-pocketed defendants.  If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a blood or bone cancer, call 1-800-BENZENE and speak directly with an attorney today.  Don’t wait.

    We are providing this mechanic acute myeloid leukemia case history to inform visitors about actual case fact patterns and rulings. Unless specifically noted, the cases summarized in this series were not handled by attorneys at Benzene Lawyers. If you believe that you have a case similar to this one, feel free to call 1-800-BENZENE and speak with an attorney today.

    Client Testimonials

    Find Out More From Our Clients

    53 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago IL 60604 US
    (312) 877-5588
    5/5 based on 4 reviews

    Wrongful Death Case

    My family hired attorney Hughes for the wrongful death of my brother. Mr. Hughes worked very hard on our case, the results were excellent. I would recommend him to anyone needing an attorney, he is a very fair and kind person.

    Unique Expertise

    Andrew took over my asthma claim with the railroad after a different law firm failed to meet expectations. Andrew’s unique expertise in the field of diesel related injury gave him the ability to build my case exceptionally well. When Andrew presented...

    Professional and Trustworthy

    From my very first contact with Andrew we have found him to be compassionate, hard working and trust worthy. In the eight months we were associated with Andrew we feel he has also become a friend of ours...

    Worked Diligently

    For the past two years Andrew Hughes has worked diligently in helping me with my case against the Norfolk Southern R.R. During this time he has kept me thoroughly informed about my case his expertise led to me getting a generous settlement...

    Above and Beyond

    The attorneys at Hughes Law Offices go above and beyond and they care about the client. Tom Guillen was always responsive and professional. He was there from the first phone call until they settled my case. I am happy with the result and would recommend them to anyone who was exposed to benzene and later developed leukemia.

    Detailed Approach

    I was impressed by their detailed approach and their ability to do the necessary research to handle my case. Tom Guillen and the lawyers at Hughes Law Offices always answered our questions and helped us understand the process. I was also happy with the way Tom was right there by my side when I had to go in for a deposition. He made sure that my words did not get twisted by the defense lawyers. My wife and I are happy with what they did for us.

    Trustworthy

    Tom Guillen was there whenever I needed him. The lawyers at his firm are trustworthy and I would recommend them to others. It was clear to me that they had the necessary experience. I am happy with the results of my benzene lawsuit.

    Always Respectful

    Tom Guillen helped me through the litigation process. He was there to answer any question I had and was always respectful of my concerns. I will always appreciate how determined he was to help my family.

    Questions? We Can Help! Contact Us Today!